‘Bridgegate’ Defense Offers Road Map For NJ RICO Case

Save as PDF

Counsel for the powerful New Jersey mogul and Democratic operatives facing explosive racketeering charges are likely to justify their actions as just business, experts told Law360, describing defense tactics similar to the ones that absolved defendants in “Bridgegate,” New Jersey’s most notorious politics-fueled crime in recent history.

The prosecution of George E. Norcross III, his law firm CEO brother and others is likely to task a jury with deciding if ruthless real estate dealings in an impoverished town banking on revitalization amount to a crime — a question likely to resonate with those familiar with the George Washington Bridge lane closure scandal, which targeted members of Gov. Chris Christie’s administration in 2013 and 2014.

In the racketeering case, one thing the state will be resting on to demonstrate George Norcross’ intent are his recorded statements, said former state prosecutor Megan B. Kilzy of Cole Schotz PC.

“I think they’re going to really emphasize the fact that we have a recording of how he has spoken to people. And this in and of itself is a huge demonstration of his intent to use his prowess and his power to pressure those who do not have that kind of influence to essentially give in to him,” Kilzy said.

The government will say that’s evidence of extortion, while the defense will likely say the recordings are taken out of context, according to Kilzy.

“I think it’s really going to be an interesting conversation or debate between the state and the defense,” Kilzy said. “I do think the defense’s arguments are largely going to be focused on how language really is used.”

And while racketeering is a hefty weight for the state to prove, it does allow the state to push first-degree charges against the defendants and signals the severity of the situation, according to Kilzy.

“I think charging racketeering does make it more complicated. I also think it’s an articulation by the state of how serious they believe these charges to be,” Kilzy said.


To read the full article please click here.

As the law continues to evolve on these matters, please note that this article is current as of date and time of publication and may not reflect subsequent developments. The content and interpretation of the issues addressed herein is subject to change. Cole Schotz P.C. disclaims any and all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this publication to the fullest extent permitted by law. This is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Do not act or refrain from acting upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining legal, financial and tax advice. For further information, please do not hesitate to reach out to your firm contact or to any of the attorneys listed in this publication.

Join Our Mailing List

Stay up to date with the latest insights, events, and more

Check all areas of law you are interested in receiving e-newsletters and alerts about:(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Practices

EACH REPRESENTATION IS A FRESH CANVAS

Practices

Our Industries

EXPERIENCE THAT GOES WHERE OUR CLIENTS GO

Industries